What we have built

Case studies

Projects that reached working code: contracted pilots, systems in operation and prototypes whose hypothesis was tested on real data. Client names stay private — only the industry, the task and what we could measure.

Every figure below was traced to a project artefact: contract scope, migrations, tests, deployment configs. Where the business effect is not yet measured, we state scope and timeline instead of percentages.

Commercial deployments

Work for external clients: from contracted pilots to systems serving live business processes.

Aviation — aircraft components trading and MRO

Pilot

Aircraft parts procurement: from inbox chaos to a managed pipeline

An AI agent reads incoming RFQs, compares supplier quotes and checks trace documents; an operations system moves each deal through mandatory stages.

Full loop
full AI loop on a live procurement process — from incoming RFQ to team notification; confirmed by the owner
3
types of trace documents checked by the agent: FAA 8130-3, EASA Form 1, COC; counted from the owner's brief

Distribution · Partner networks

In production

A sales and support platform for a distributed partner network

Partners ask who on their team is inactive and what blocks the next level — and get numbers for their own part of the network only, enforced at the SQL level.

20 of 21
UAT checks passed on the client's live back-office database (reconciliation protocol); one partial — no last-activity date in the data
10 of 10
question categories from the assistant behaviour spec (~25 scenarios) implemented; one sub-item outstanding (checklist count)

Manufacturing · Building materials

MVP in operation

Panel specs from CAD drawings in seconds, not hours

Reads DWG/DXF layouts and builds the Excel spec: 10–30 seconds instead of 2–15 hours by hand. All 784 panels of one real project matched the manual spec line by line.

784/784 and 189/189
panels on one project and wall panels on another matched the manual specs line by line, size groups included; area within 0.001 m²
2–15 h → 10–30 s
to produce a project spec: manual work vs app processing, measured on real projects

Marketplace e-commerce · Sales analytics

In production

One profit per SKU across three marketplaces, reconciled to 0.00%

Five seller accounts on WB, Ozon and Yandex Market merged into one SKU-level P&L: 0.00% variance vs the client's manual benchmark, forecast 2.7× more accurate than naive.

0.00%
variance vs the client's manual benchmark across units, revenue, COGS, profit and margin for a control SKU over a month; threshold was 1%
2.7×
more accurate than naive: weekly WAPE on SKUs driving 80% of revenue, 29.6% vs 81.4%. The 25% goal is open: history covers 66.9% of SKUs

Music tech · SaaS

MVP in operation (closed launch)

Music releases without missed deadlines

Release ops for independent labels: 9-stage lifecycle, pitching deadlines for 12 stores, AI drafts with human approval. Zero to production-grade in 7 weeks.

7 weeks
from first commit to a production-grade stack with Vault, encrypted backups, SLOs and a move to a Russian data centre (265 commits)
16 days
from project start to an investor presentation with a live product demo

Real estate · PropTech marketplace

MVP in operation

Land-plot marketplace with a next-step plan: MVP in 2 months

From a mock-up to a working platform: plot → works → contractor → request. Rule-based next-step engine, three dashboards, personal-data compliance. MVP in 2 months.

2 months
from approved spec to pre-release MVP on an HTTPS stand — week 9 against the plan's own 10–13 week estimate
7 days
from spec to the first full-implementation commit: 168 files, 21.5k lines, then two months of hardening to pre-release

Marketplace e-commerce · Pricing

Pilot

Repricing without manual price control: a contract-guaranteed pilot

Competitor prices tracked per SKU on the marketplace, a price computed inside an agreed corridor, applied only after confirmation. Pilot: 10 SKUs, setup within 14 days.

10 SKUs · 2 scenarios
pilot scope; the SKU cap and both scenarios are enforced in code and verified by contract tests — the cap cannot be exceeded
up to 14 days
contractual setup window from client inputs to launch, then a 1-month pilot; the service tracks the dates and closes access when the period ends

EdTech · HR-tech

MVP in operation (demo stand)

From business canvas to a student-work marketplace demo in about six weeks

The client had a business model and no product. We built a student-task marketplace MVP where the server enforces legal and platform rules, and put a demo stand live.

~6 weeks
from first commit to a deployed demo with all workspaces; 7 working days in commit history
3 checks
run by the server before a contractor is assigned: data consent, self-employed status, mentor — each with a plain refusal

Own products and research

What we build for ourselves: platforms, libraries and open research projects — the proving ground for the approaches our clients get.

AI infrastructure / multi-agent systems

In-house product

Agent teams assembled by configuration that review their own work

Core of a multi-agent platform built in 2.5 weeks: 29 declarative agents in three teams, agent-critic pairs, shared memory on four databases, five autonomy levels.

25,000+
lines of Python in the platform core across 134 modules, counted from the repository
29
declarative agents in three ready-made teams — engineering, cognitive, research; counted from YAML specs

AI infrastructure / multi-agent systems R&D

Research project

A multi-agent environment where rules are code, not prompts

In four days we built and open-sourced (MIT) an agent environment where constraints are enforced in code: cryptography, Byzantine consensus, reproducible experiments.

64 × 10,000
agents × ticks in the reference experiment: 131,372 events, zero invariant violations; sha256 attestation independently verified
up to 3.9×
faster policy tick on the reference load (1,126.7 → 286.5 ms) with bit-identical hashes; measured with the committed profiling script

EdTech / AI research

Research project

Long-term student memory: from hypothesis to a working service

A neuromorphic memory core and cognitive digital twins of students: 32 REST endpoints, 368 tests and formally verified memory convergence — built in a 10-day sprint.

10 days
from first commit to a release with formal verification, measured by commit dates
368
test functions across 37 files, counted from code

Scientific computing / R&D

Research project

From mathematical theory to a verified numerical library in 9 months

A compensated-computation library: precision loss is visible and auditable, properties machine-proved in Lean 4, every numeric claim backed by a reproducible benchmark.

1.0 instead of 0.0
residual preserved on the [1e16, 1, −1e16] aggregation that float silently drops; reproducible benchmark artifact in the repository
≥10x
stability ratio vs float64 on catastrophic cancellation; pinned baseline under regression control in CI

EdTech · Mobile app

In-house product

A mobile client for an AI learning platform, built without waiting on the backend

Flutter client for an exam-prep platform: adaptive micro-lessons, a streaming AI assistant, a knowledge map. UI built in parallel with the backend via a mock layer.

13 weeks
from first commit to a working app with auth, goals, lessons and AI chat
41 → 81 endpoints
API coverage doubled from MVP to the extended version — 14 → 31 modules on the same architecture

IT consulting · Lead qualification

In-house product

A pilot plan for the visitor, a qualified lead for sales

We replaced the contact form with an AI consultant: it interviews the visitor, returns a pilot plan with KPIs and risks, and sales gets a lead with budget and timeline.

1 day
Working MVP — frontend, backend and deploy configs — built in a single day
16 days
From first commit to production with HTTPS and an issued certificate on its own domain

EdTech · Knowledge platforms

StudyNinja and KnowledgeBaseAI

The learning platform and the graph knowledge platform are covered in the Ecosystem section.

Estimate the impact first

Size the payback of automating a similar process before the first call — no commitment, no price of ours.

Estimate the impact with AVA

Have a similar task?

Describe the process and the data. Before any work starts we will tell you what can be measured in money and what cannot.

or email us directly: hello@xteam.pro

Or write to hello@xteam.pro