AVA · Numbers before the conversation
AVA works out what a manual process costs you today and what budget for automating it would pay back. It computes in your browser, on your figures, with no form and no price of ours. If it will not pay off, it says so.
For anyone deciding what to tackle first, or holding a quote and wanting to check it against arithmetic.
Describe what eats the time and we point you at a process we have economics for. Nothing invented: these are the same six processes.
We ask for two figures, not one: the spread is the honest answer. The range in the result comes from here.
120 000 × 1.302 payroll contributions ÷ 164 working hours = 953 ₽ per hour of employer cost
These are the places where we are not deciding for you. Change any of them and the result recalculates.
Automation removes: 77 % of the operationA person still checks: 15 % of what was automated
The process costs today
80 h — 240 h per month
910 000 ₽ — 2 750 000 ₽ per year
Freed up
52 h — 155 h per month
590 000 ₽ — 1 800 000 ₽ per year
Worth costing further
On your numbers the process pays for its automation even on a normal operation. What is left is to verify the share against real data — here it is an assumption.
Budget that pays back
This is not our price. It is your ceiling: a project costing more will not pay back inside that horizon. Take the figure to any contractor — including not us.
Looks like a solution
Document AI
Turning files and documents into structured data: extraction, classification, completeness checks — with a human confirmation before anything is written.
Optional. It appears only when you enter your own figures — we do not invent them for you.
By default freed hours count as cost saved — hours are not yet revenue. If the freed time goes into sales, enter the margin per hour.
We do not measure your error rate for you: automation checks every operation against formal rules, a person still re-checks part of it. Enter your current error rate and the cost of unpicking one and we compute it as your assumption.
(operations × minutes ÷ 60) × 77 % × (100 − 15) % × 953 ₽ − 15 240 ₽
Employer cost of an hour: salary × 1.302 ÷ 164. Running cost: 12 ₽ per operation for model calls plus a fixed monthly amount for supervision and infrastructure — it scales with volume, never with your payroll.
Year one is counted with a ramp to full effect: 40% · 75% · 100% · 100% by quarter. Running cost is paid from month one regardless.
Anchored to a delivered CAD-to-spec project: on control objects the app matched the manual spec line by line — 784 of 784 and 189 of 189 panels, area within 0.001 m². Per object: 2–15 hours by hand versus 10–30 seconds processed.
We publish no verified price range, and inventing one here would be a lie inside the very figure this page exists to keep honest. So it computes a budget ceiling instead: what a project may cost and still pay back within your horizon. Take that number to any contractor — it is arguably more useful against someone else's quote than against ours.
It is the one place where our estimate enters the arithmetic instead of your data. The band under each process traces to a specific delivered project, and where that project did not measure the effect, we say so. The control is left open deliberately: put your own figure in if you have one.
An hour that stops going into manual work becomes money only if you leave a vacancy unopened, cut a contract, or move that person onto work that earns. If the freed time simply dissipates, the saving stays on paper. The page shows both hours and rubles — what they become is your decision.
So we ask for a normal operation and a heavy one, and answer with a range. When the spread exceeds fourfold, the page says the estimate is no longer meaningful from memory and offers a measurement — which is more honest than printing the average.
The figure above rests on one assumption — the share automation removes. Send us 30 anonymised operations from a month and we will replace the assumption with a measurement: the real share and the real time, returned as a file with the arithmetic and the method. Free. If it does not pay off, we will say so plainly — that happens regularly.
Because we do not have an honest figure for this page. The same sentence describes wildly different amounts of work: "automate request handling" is both a two-week scenario on clean data and a six-month project across five systems. We give a range after a short conversation and confirm it after a diagnostic. The budget ceiling, meanwhile, you can compute here without us.
Your figures go nowhere. The whole calculation runs in your browser, and no entered value is sent to the server until you press Send in the form at the bottom. We do not write them into the address bar either, which is why the URL never changes as you move the controls. Only anonymised interface events — which process is selected and which verdict came out — go to analytics, and only after you consent to analytics. Salary, volume, minutes and budget never reach the counters.
Because it is our cost, not yours: model calls scale with the number of operations, while quality supervision and infrastructure are a fixed monthly amount. An earlier version of this model defined running cost as a share of the saving, so raising the salary control tripled the hosting bill. That was wrong and we rewrote it.
That on a normal operation the saving does not cover the running cost, and on a heavy one it does. The decision then depends on which kind you have more of — and there is no answer to that from memory. Such a process is worth measuring first and discussing second.
We measure on them what was an assumption here: how long an operation really takes and what share can actually be removed. You get a file with the arithmetic and the method, so it can be checked without us. It is free and commits you to nothing. If it does not pay off, we write that — it happens regularly.
The same problem, rewritten from scratch. The old version demanded a name, email, phone, company and job title first, then opened a chat with a model that produced prose without a single figure. It is now the other way round: numbers immediately and without a form, conversation afterwards and only if you want one.