EdTech / AI research

Long-term student memory: from hypothesis to a working service

A research neuromorphic memory core and a student model, taken to a service in 10 days: 32 REST endpoints, 368 tests, 21 Lean 4 statements. The code is open.

Status
Research project
Timeline
10-day sprint
Stack
  • Python
  • NumPy
  • PyTorch
  • FastAPI
  • Redis
  • Lean 4

The task

An education platform needed long-term memory of each student: a model of topic mastery, forgetting and current state. A gradebook or prompt context does not give that. We framed it as research: build such a memory and take it to a service the platform can plug in.

What we built

Outcome

10 days
from first commit to a release with formal verification, measured by commit dates
368
test functions across 37 files, counted from code
21
Lean 4 statements about the classical Hopfield network, zero sorry, compiler-checked; the spiking core is not covered
32
REST endpoints, 12 of them for the student model; counted from router code

Services

More cases

Manufacturing · Building materials

MVP in operation

Panel specs from CAD drawings in seconds, not hours

Reads DWG/DXF layouts and builds the Excel spec: 10–⁠30 seconds instead of 2–⁠15 hours by hand. All 784 panels of one real project matched the manual spec line by line.

784/784 and 189/189
panels on one project and wall panels on another matched the manual specs line by line, size groups included; area within 0.001 m²
2–15 h → 10–30 s
to produce a project spec: manual work vs app processing, measured on real projects

Real estate · PropTech marketplace

MVP in operation

Land-plot marketplace with a next-step plan: MVP in 2 months

From a mock-up to a working platform: plot → works → contractor → request. Rule-based next-step engine, three dashboards, personal-data compliance. MVP in 2 months.

2 months
from approved spec to a pre-release MVP on an HTTPS stand: week 9 against the plan’s own 10–13 week estimate
7 days
from spec to the first full-implementation commit: 168 files, 21.5k lines, then two months of hardening to pre-release

Marketplace e-commerce · Pricing

Pilot

Rule-based repricing: a pilot whose contract terms are enforced in code

Competitor prices tracked per SKU, a price computed by rules inside an agreed corridor and applied only after confirmation. Pilot: 10 SKUs, setup within 14 days.

10 SKUs · 2 scenarios
pilot scope; the SKU cap and both scenarios are enforced in code and verified by contract tests, so the cap cannot be exceeded
up to 14 days
contractual setup window from client inputs to launch, then a 1-month pilot; the service tracks the dates and closes access when the period ends

Estimate the payback of a similar process

AVA lets you work out the economics of your process on your own figures, with no form and no price from us. It shows what the manual work costs, what cash effect automation would give and what budget would pay back. If the effect does not even cover running costs, it says so.

Estimate the payback

Discuss a similar problem

Describe the process and the data you have. Before any work starts we will tell you what can be measured in money, what cannot, and whether it is worth doing.

In the reply we will say what we understood, what we need to clarify and whether it is worth doing.

or email us directly: hello@xteam.pro

New write-ups on Telegram