Scientific computing / R&D

From mathematical theory to a verified numerical library in 9 months

A compensated-computation library: precision loss is visible and auditable, properties machine-proved in Lean 4, every numeric claim backed by a reproducible benchmark.

Status
Research project
Timeline
9 months
Stack
  • Python
  • NumPy
  • PyTorch
  • Pydantic
  • Lean 4 + Mathlib
  • GitHub Actions

The task

Floating-point arithmetic loses information silently: summing [1e16, 1, −1e16] returns 0, meaningful differences collapse to false zeros, and division by zero throws instead of joining the data model. Pipelines patch this with scattered edge-case workarounds. We set out to build arithmetic where precision loss and singularities are explicit, structured, and auditable — with claimed properties proved and measured.

What we built

Outcome

1.0 instead of 0.0
residual preserved on the [1e16, 1, −1e16] aggregation that float silently drops; reproducible benchmark artifact in the repository
≥10x
stability ratio vs float64 on catastrophic cancellation; pinned baseline under regression control in CI
0 unproven statements
machine-checked proofs of arithmetic properties in Lean 4 + Mathlib (zero sorry placeholders); the build certifies no extra axioms
9 months
from first commit to stable 1.0.0 with 854 tests, an 85% coverage gate, and an automated package release pipeline

More cases

Manufacturing · Building materials

MVP in operation

Panel specs from CAD drawings in seconds, not hours

Reads DWG/DXF layouts and builds the Excel spec: 10–30 seconds instead of 2–15 hours by hand. All 784 panels of one real project matched the manual spec line by line.

784/784 and 189/189
panels on one project and wall panels on another matched the manual specs line by line, size groups included; area within 0.001 m²
2–15 h → 10–30 s
to produce a project spec: manual work vs app processing, measured on real projects

Real estate · PropTech marketplace

MVP in operation

Land-plot marketplace with a next-step plan: MVP in 2 months

From a mock-up to a working platform: plot → works → contractor → request. Rule-based next-step engine, three dashboards, personal-data compliance. MVP in 2 months.

2 months
from approved spec to pre-release MVP on an HTTPS stand — week 9 against the plan's own 10–13 week estimate
7 days
from spec to the first full-implementation commit: 168 files, 21.5k lines, then two months of hardening to pre-release

Marketplace e-commerce · Pricing

Pilot

Repricing without manual price control: a contract-guaranteed pilot

Competitor prices tracked per SKU on the marketplace, a price computed inside an agreed corridor, applied only after confirmation. Pilot: 10 SKUs, setup within 14 days.

10 SKUs · 2 scenarios
pilot scope; the SKU cap and both scenarios are enforced in code and verified by contract tests — the cap cannot be exceeded
up to 14 days
contractual setup window from client inputs to launch, then a 1-month pilot; the service tracks the dates and closes access when the period ends

Estimate the impact on your own figures

AVA is a process-economics calculator. In a couple of minutes it shows whether a similar task pays off in your case — before any call and with no commitment.

Estimate the impact with AVA

Have a similar task?

Describe the process and the data you have. We will tell you what can be measured in money and what cannot — before any work starts.

or email us directly: hello@xteam.pro

or email us directly: hello@xteam.pro