AI infrastructure / multi-agent systems

Agent teams assembled by configuration that review their own work

Core of a multi-agent platform built in 2.5 weeks: 29 declarative agents in three teams, agent-critic pairs, shared memory on four databases, five autonomy levels.

Status
In-house product
Timeline
2.5 weeks (core)
Stack
  • Python
  • LangGraph + LangChain
  • FastMCP
  • Redis / Qdrant / Neo4j / PostgreSQL
  • OpenAI + Anthropic
  • Docker + Traefik

The task

Ad-hoc LLM chains do not scale into a product platform: no task routing, no review of agent output, nothing accumulated between runs, and autonomy is all-or-nothing. We needed one core for several products — engineering, research and cognitive agent teams on a shared platform with quality control and managed autonomy.

What we built

Outcome

25,000+
lines of Python in the platform core across 134 modules, counted from the repository
29
declarative agents in three ready-made teams — engineering, cognitive, research; counted from YAML specs
223
automated tests at three levels: unit, integration, end-to-end; counted from the test suite
2.5 weeks
from first commit to a working core with memory, agent-critic pairs and a dashboard, per repository history

More cases

Aviation — aircraft components trading and MRO

Pilot

Aircraft parts procurement: from inbox chaos to a managed pipeline

An AI agent reads incoming RFQs, compares supplier quotes and checks trace documents; an operations system moves each deal through mandatory stages.

Full loop
full AI loop on a live procurement process — from incoming RFQ to team notification; confirmed by the owner
3
types of trace documents checked by the agent: FAA 8130-3, EASA Form 1, COC; counted from the owner's brief

Distribution · Partner networks

In production

A sales and support platform for a distributed partner network

Partners ask who on their team is inactive and what blocks the next level — and get numbers for their own part of the network only, enforced at the SQL level.

20 of 21
UAT checks passed on the client's live back-office database (reconciliation protocol); one partial — no last-activity date in the data
10 of 10
question categories from the assistant behaviour spec (~25 scenarios) implemented; one sub-item outstanding (checklist count)

Music tech · SaaS

MVP in operation (closed launch)

Music releases without missed deadlines

Release ops for independent labels: 9-stage lifecycle, pitching deadlines for 12 stores, AI drafts with human approval. Zero to production-grade in 7 weeks.

7 weeks
from first commit to a production-grade stack with Vault, encrypted backups, SLOs and a move to a Russian data centre (265 commits)
16 days
from project start to an investor presentation with a live product demo

Estimate the impact on your own figures

AVA is a process-economics calculator. In a couple of minutes it shows whether a similar task pays off in your case — before any call and with no commitment.

Estimate the impact with AVA

Have a similar task?

Describe the process and the data you have. We will tell you what can be measured in money and what cannot — before any work starts.

or email us directly: hello@xteam.pro

or email us directly: hello@xteam.pro